Showing posts with label Poses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Poses. Show all posts

Thursday, March 9, 2017

Friday Q A Timing Your Yoga Poses


Q: You sometimes suggest staying in a pose for about 90 seconds. Is there a way you tell that it’s 90 seconds? Sometimes 90 seconds is a long time and sometimes it is fleeting.

I don’t want to stare at the second hand of a clock – which seems to negate many of the benefits. I set my cell phone alarm when I mediate but I don’t want to reset it every 90 seconds for this purpose - again, there goes any peace.

While I don’t want to obsess about time, I don’t want to stop at 20 seconds when I can do more. I’m not talking about working through pain or discomfort. It’s not my body as much as my mind.

I’m having difficulty articulating my question clearly; I hope it makes sense to you.


A: Fortunately, there is any easy answer to your question! If you don’t want to use a countdown timer to time your poses, you can count your breaths. This is not only simple but has the added benefit of focusing your attention on your breath, making your practice a more mindful experience.

The first thing to do is to figure out how many breaths you take per minute. Since the number of breaths you take per minute varies with the type of pose that you’re doing, you should take about three measurements. Using a timer set for one minute, count your natural breaths in:
  1. a simple seated pose
  2. a comfortable stretching pose
  3. a vigorous standing pose, such as Warrior 1
Once you’ve established a one-minute count, you can then use that number to estimate a given length of time in a certain pose. For example, if you take 16 breaths per minute in a comfortable stretching pose, 90 seconds would be about equivalent to 24 breaths. Of course, this is just approximate, but there is no need for precision in these situations. The only reason we give fixed times for holding poses (rather than numbers of breaths) is because everyone’s breathing patterns—along with their physical abilities—are so different. You may even find that your own breathing patterns change over time, but you can always re-test yourself.

When you want to increase your endurance in difficult poses, counting your breaths is a great way to time yourself. Each month, for example, you could add one more breath to your count, and over time you would quite gradually be increasing your time in the pose and building your strength.

For restorative poses, where you are going to hold the pose for several minutes, you may prefer to use a timer. But it’s completely up to you.

—Nina

Subscribe to Yoga for Healthy Aging by Email ° Follow Yoga for Healthy Aging on Facebook ° Join this site with Google Friend Connect

Monday, February 13, 2017

Strength Building How Long to Hold Poses


by Baxter
Joy Sassoon, Age 60, Photographed by Tanya Constantine
In past posts, I have tried to give you some guidelines on how to use yoga poses to increase or maintain the strength of your both your bones and muscles (see Yoga for Strength: An Overview). Today based on some new information I have learned, I’d like to revisit my guidelines for how long to hold your poses because I’m going to make some different recommendations. 

Building Stronger Bones 

For building stronger bones, I initially used information from Loren Fishman’s book Yoga for Osteoporosis, in which he cited an animal study that showed placing strain on a bone starts to stimulate new bone to be laid down as early as 8 seconds. But in his recently completed 10-year study that utilized 12 poses done over 12 minutes, Dr. Fishman had the participants hold the poses for 30 seconds each (nine of the poses were asymmetric and therefore would take 1 minute total to complete) with positive results. So for strengthening bones, I'm now going to suggest that you hold your postures for 30 seconds, if possible. Could you hold them for less than 30 seconds, especially if you are weak or fatigued? Sure, but we don’t have evidence at this time that those timings would be as effective for bone building. 

Building Stronger Muscles

In my post Yoga for Strength: An Overview, I recommended that holding your poses statically for 90 seconds would build muscle effectively. Unfortunately, I cannot locate the research I used to make that statement. But in going back to look at this more closely for our upcoming book, I discovered some important facts I’d like to share with you today that flip my earlier recommendations almost upside down. 

There are two commonly used techniques to build muscle mass and strength, both in sports training and rehabilitation from injury. The first technique uses motion against resistance, called resistance training, as in curling a 10lb. weight up and down with your arm smoothly at the gym to build up your bicep. This utilizes what is known as “isotonic” muscle contraction (with the muscle contracting and visibly shortening during the curl) against some sort of resistance (the hand weight) to build muscle. And because you lower the weight down slowly, your bicep muscle also is contracting as it is grossly lengthening, which is called “eccentric” contraction. For this action to be effective, you have to do multiple repetitions. In our yoga practice, dynamic sequences or mini vinyasas could count as resistance training, especially if you do them more slowly. Since we are using our own body weight as the resistance, it may not work as quickly to build muscle as weight training, but it will still build strength. See below for more recommendations about how to use this technique in your asana practice. 

The second technique is isometric holds, usually accomplished by pushing or pulling on an immovable object, which maximally contracts the muscles involved without changing the gross length of the muscle (in other words, triggering an isometric contraction of those muscles). You can trigger the same response—although maybe not as maximally—by pretending to push or pull against an imaginary surface/object in yoga poses. For example, as you come into the full Warrior 2 pose (Virabradrasana 2) and hold it for a while, the leg muscles that keep you in position, such as the quadriceps, and the muscles that keep the arms out to your sides, such as the middle deltoids, are all working isometrically. You can enhance the number of muscles contracting isometrically by consciously firming all the muscles around a particular bone or joint towards the bone, sometimes called “hugging the bone”. In the world of sports training, these holds are usually for 8-10 seconds and done in a set of 6-12 reps, sometimes for more than one set. If we applied this to our yoga practice, you could do six rounds of a mini vinyasa, staying in the full pose for 3-4 breaths (around 10 seconds), while hugging the muscles to your bones in all the major areas that you want to strengthen. You could even do a second set.

If you want to practice mini vinyasas for strength, which of these two techniques should you choose? Both ways can build strength, although the second technique might arguably do it faster. But if you are new to the practice, out of shape and weak, or simply wish to gently warm up your muscles, you might wish to start with the first technique. I, myself, prefer the first technique when I plan on practicing a static hold of the pose afterward.  

Now, what about longer isometric holds? Certain modern yoga systems encourage longer holds for poses that are strengthening, such as Warrior 3 (Virabradrasana 3). The Iyengar yoga system is a prime example of this approach. Isometric training is said to have the advantage of not putting as much stress on joints as other muscle building methods, which could be particularly useful in rehabbing an injury. Another strength building concept could apply here: the idea of taking the muscles to a point of fatigue, possibly indicated by muscle shakiness, as a way of stimulating the muscle to grow. But whether that is definitely applicable here is unclear. One study I reviewed did compare shorter 3 second isometric holds to longer 30 second holds, and found that the longer holds led to greater strength in the muscles tested. But another study showed no difference in strength gains in a group over 55 between short and longer holds, yet both groups did get stronger. And, for even longer holds, it may be that you will be increasing muscle endurance, rather than muscles strength, which is a different quality and characteristic of muscles.

The only warning about longer isometric holds is that they can cause an increase in blood pressure during the hold, so those with untreated hypertension should probably avoid this method until their blood pressure is under control. 



Here are my new recommendations for building bone and muscle strength: 
  1. For building bone strength, hold poses for 30 seconds or more, if possible. 
  2. For building muscles using isotonic and eccentric contraction with a mini vinyasa, do the vinyasa slowly for six repetitions, possibly for two sets of six. As you increase in strength, you can add more reps per set. 
  3. For building muscles isometrically with a mini vinyasa, hold the full pose for 8-10 seconds (3-4 breaths) for six repetitions, possibly for two sets of six. For example, if you were doing the Warrior 2 mini vinyasa, you would inhale from the starting position into the full pose, hold full Warrior 2 for four breaths, and then exhale back into the starting position. 
  4. For building muscle strength and endurance in static poses, hold a full pose isometrically until your targeted muscles become shaky and feel fatigued, and then exit the pose. The length of time you hold the pose could be short if you are weak, out of shape, or recovering from injury, or much longer if you are healthy and relatively strong to start. You can gradually build up your length of time in the pose as your strength increases. 
In general, do your strength practices every other day to allow a day off for muscles to rest and repair, which is part of the muscle building process. (On alternate days, focus more on gentler practices, such as stretching or restorative practices, or work on pranayama and meditation.) 

Ram’s post Yoga Asanas: Resistance Training or Endurance Training? from few years back addresses some of these concepts in slightly different ways, and is worth a read if you have not seen it before. And thanks to our contributing writer Shelly Prosko for some additional information that helped clarify things for me! See these links:

The role of metabolites in strength training. II. Short versus long isometric contractions

Effects of isometric strength training on quadriceps muscle properties in over 55 year olds

Isometric Exercises & Static Strength Training


Subscribe to Yoga for Healthy Aging by Email ° Follow Yoga for Healthy Aging on Facebook ° Join this site with Google Friend Connect

Monday, January 16, 2017

Friday Q A Dangerous Poses for Osteopenia


Q: Could you please post an article discussing dangerous yoga positions for women with osteopenia in the spine? I am a 57 yr old woman with a -1.7 T score (?) for my spine on my last DEXA scan. I am doing the yoga poses for strengthening bones in Loren Fishman's “Yoga for Osteoporosis.” I can easily do most of the versions of the poses for osteopenia, but worry about doing the classical poses, especially the twists and those involving forward flexion. I would love to hear your views on this.


A: I’ll start by addressing why it may be dangerous for people with osteoporosis to do spinal flexion (forward bending of the spine). When we round the spine into a flexed position, such as in a seated forward bend, the front of the vertebral bodies will have more weight than the back of the vertebral bodies, and this uneven weight bearing is the potential culprit for causing vertebral body fractures.

Additionally, in osteoporosis there are often changes in the spinal curves, and an increase in thoracic kyphosis occurs with a decrease in lumbar lordosis. This is commonly due to loss of vertebral disc height and to poor posture with postural adaption due to decreased back extensor strength. The changes in the spinal curves will cause a “wedging.” The change in the vertebral body shape cannot sustain the biomechanical loads generated in forward bends when the spine flexes. The postural changes may also be associated with shortening of the trunk flexors (the abdominal and hip flexor muscles), so when we bend forward and our spine rounds, the muscle contraction of the front trunk muscles puts more pressure on the front of the vertebral bodies and this also increases fracture risk.

Dr. Loren Fishman cites that decreased back extensor strength predisposes individuals with osteoporosis to a three times higher fracture risk than individuals with strong back extensors who do not have osteoporosis. Some yoga teachers are absolute in preventing students who have had prior vertebral fractures from doing ANY poses that cause spinal flexion. That would include either single or double Knee to Chest, Reclined Leg Stretch series (Supta Padangusthasana), and Child’s pose (Balasana). However, I am a proponent of learning to move from your hip joints and keeping your spine in neutral (not rounded) when working in forward bending positions. In my mind, rolling in bed, getting out of a car, or getting up from a low couch may present more fracture risk than a mindful, slow yoga practice!

Now, what about twisting? How you twist and how you move into a twist are the crucial elements for osteoporosis safety. Twists involve compression, bending, torsion and bone shear, which is stimulating to bone growth. However, if you use your arms and force yourself into a twisted position, you are running a risk of fracture and more. Body parts do not like to be forced into any positions! On the other hand, if you use your breath, awareness and move SLOWLY into a twist position without using your arms to leverage the twist, your fracture risk is much reduced. Paying careful attention to maintaining your neutral spinal curves prior to the twist is also important.

I hope this helps you with your practice!

—Shari

Subscribe to Yoga for Healthy Aging by Email ° Follow Yoga for Healthy Aging on Facebook ° Join this site with Google Friend Connect

Monday, October 3, 2016

Favorite Least Favorite Poses


by Nina
In his first draft of his post for yesterday Featured Pose: Extended Side Angle Pose Baxter wrote "This is one of our favorite poses!" Haha, very funny, I wrote back. I'm taking that sentence out because this one is definitely on my list of least favorite standing poses. He replied, "I had no idea." 

Well, I've written before about how our body types and areas of flexibility are very different (I'm much more flexible in the hamstrings and he's more flexible in external rotation of the hips), despite years of practice for the both of us, so the differences in our experiences of this pose might something to do with that. But I also wondered if it might have something to do with the difference in the shapes of the male and female pelvis, because my discomfort in this pose (and, trust me, I've tried all kinds of different alignment tips and tricks over the years so it's not an issue of finding the right alignment) is in the hip joint area. Baxter thought this an intriguing possibility, and suggested that I do a poll.

So what do you say? Are you up for it? Would you be willing to respond in the comments or send me an email (see the Contact Us page) specifying your gender and listing your three favorite standing poses and three least favorite standing poses? Maybe we'll see some interesting patterns. But even if we don't, it's always helpful for people to see the wide variety of responses people have to various yoga poses. 

Subscribe to Yoga for Healthy Aging by Email ° Follow Yoga for Healthy Aging on Facebook ° Join this site with Google Friend Connect